Book review: An Intimate War. An Oral History of the Helmand Conflict by Mike Martin

Book review: An Intimate War. An Oral History of the Helmand Conflict by Mike Martin
by Ian Sinclair
Peace News
January 2015

Last year it was reported the Ministry of Defence (MoD) had tried to stop the publication of An Intimate War, written by British army officer Mike Martin. The MoD argued it was inappropriate for a serving officer (Martin has since resigned) to publish such a critical work about the British 2006-14 occupation of Helmand province in Afghanistan.

There is certainly much to embarrass the British military in Martin’s work – a reworking of his PhD thesis. Based on over 150 interviews with Helmandis, international forces and members of the Taliban, Martin maps out in painful detail the staggering level of ignorance and incompetence shown by the British and United States. This unawareness led to them being manipulated by local actors and often making things worse on the ground.

Reading Martin’s account of the history of Helmand from 1978 to the present day one has sympathy with the British forces – the politics of the province is a mind-bogglingly complex story of side-switching power politics. The mammoth 130 pages of appendices, including a glossary of terms and people, provide much needed context and assistance but the sheer volume of unavoidably confusing detail will likely stump many readers.

Martin, a fluent Pashto speaker, is no peace activist. His key concern seems to be efficiency and quality of the Helmand operation and future military occupations, rather than questioning them from a moral perspective. Accordingly, former Chief of Defence Staff General Sir David Richards provides a glowing endorsement, noting he wished he had read the book before he deployed to Afghanistan. Nonetheless, there is still much of interest to anti-war activists, including many eye-opening nuggets of information. For example, Martin spends considerable time demolishing what he calls the dominant “insurgency narrative”, which sees British and Government forces as advancing democracy and protecting women’s rights in the face of opposition from a unified, externally-sourced Taliban movement. In reality, he notes the Government was no better than the groups who made up the ‘Taliban’, which itself was largely made up of Helmandi men. Martin notes that in summer 2006 British forces dropped 18,000 pounds of explosive on the town of Now Zad alone, “flattening the bazaar” and killing civilians. This “injudicious use of firepower was reminiscent of Soviet military operations” and “made funding and recruitment non-issues” for the insurgency, he explains.

A colossal academic study that is unlikely to be bettered anytime soon, An Intimate War is essential reading for anyone who wants to understand the British occupation of Afghanistan.

An Intimate War: An Oral History of the Helmand Conflict is published by Hurst, priced £25.

Advertisements

One thought on “Book review: An Intimate War. An Oral History of the Helmand Conflict by Mike Martin

  1. Pingback: Just how anti-war is Ed Miliband? | Ian Sinclair journalism

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s